A trip down memory lane without looking at the dark and less than pleasant things is really no different than walking down
Main Street USA at Disneyland.
As much as I love Disneyland, that's not our purpose here. And unfortunately, we find ourselves, once again, with a questionable comment that in our times would be considered quite racist. I'm doing my best to try to look at it through the context of 1922, but no matter how hard I try, I can't rationalize it, and that's why I've chosen to not quote it here.
But now I find myself quite curious about how race relations played into fraternities and
sororities. I have known that there were fraternities and
sororities specifically for African American and Jewish students; there were a number of each on the campus of my Alma Mater. I'm not
naive enough to think that fraternities and
sororities weren't segregated, even in states without Jim Crow laws. I had just never thought about it until now and for the sake of this project, I decided to dig deeper.
Stupidly, I started my quest typing into my google search "racism fraternity." It was a query that returned almost 260,000 hits, most of which are undoubtedly referencing recent events.
Narrowing down my search to fraternity and race relationships, I came across this story recounted by James
Vorosmarti Jr. of Lafayette College, a brother of Phi Kappa Tau.
http://www.lafayette.edu/news.php/view/10558His story is not unlike many others I discovered; stories that tell of "gentlemen agreements" that essentially barred chapters from initiating anyone other than christian white males.
In the stories I have read thus far, an awakening among the student population that this was clearly wrong, appears to have took place in the mid-to-late 1950's. The stories tend to mirror Mr.
Vorosmarti's experience where certain chapters challenge the national organization on these mandates, and often end up
seceding from the national fraternity in protest.
However if this is the case, we have about 30 years of A
rchi's where we may stumble into pronouncements like the one here on page 4.
I dismayed to discover in the March 15, 1923 issue of the
Archi, that our fraternity was not one of the organizations that maintained a racial status
quo with a "
gentleman's agreement". Instead, being "white male" was listed as one of the requirements for membership in our National Constitution.
Shocking.